Georgetown University and Charles Sturt University Conference 2024
Isnād-cum-Matn Analysis (ICMA) as a Method in Contemporary Hadith Studies
Call for papers closed on 31 August 2023.
The Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding of Georgetown University and the Centre for Islamic Studies and Civilisation of Charles Sturt University in collaboration with Comparative Islamic Studies (Equinox Journal) are pleased to host an online conference on Isnād-cum-matn Analysis (ICMA) as a Method in Contemporary Hadith Studies on 27-28 January 2024.
Western academic scholarship on the origin and transmission of hadith and traditional Muslim hadith methodologies of authentication, though studying the same body of literature, often operate in disconnected universes. It is of scholarly importance to academic development and for the continued vibrancy of the hadith tradition, as practiced by Muslim ulema, that dialogue continues between the two. Conferences aiming to do so, such as the one at Pembroke College, Oxford in 2019 on the topic of Modern Hadith Studies between Arabophone and Western scholarship, are a welcome effort, though the field remains siloed.
Since the academic movement most closely associated with the work of Harold Motzki from the 1990s, there has been a shift beyond the so-called ‘skeptical’ school with respect to hadith using the technique of ICMA. This method analyses the variation of hadith texts according to their paths of transmission, seeking to provide a reliable date for the time at which a hadith was first in common circulation (as witnessed by its corroborated chains). Scholars with a range of theoretical perspectives have used this methodology to analyze and in particular, date hadiths on various topics. The method is commonly used to recover as much as possible of the hadith corpus as a viable historical source for the first two centuries of Islam, even though the canonical compilations date mainly to the third century and later. Though ICMA has received positive reception, especially in the context of the prior prevailing academic skepticism about hadith, critical voices have been raised. Some scholars have argued for the continuation of a more skeptical attitude towards the transmission of hadith, based on the ways that fabricated reports and chains can enter the corpus. Others have suggested that Motzki’s focus on full textual corroboration does not go far enough and other techniques, including those used within the Islamic intellectual tradition, could be legitimately added to date hadiths earlier still. Finally, some scholars defend the integrity of the canonical hadith collections as a whole.
This conference will provide a forum for the assessment of an international group of experts on hadith, from a variety of backgrounds and theoretical perspectives. The intention is to provide a ‘state of the art’ appraisal of ICMA within hadith studies and related academic disciplines, with selected papers published with the blind peer reviewed journal Comparative Islamic Studies.
The conference invites papers on a range of methodological and historiographical inquiries surrounding the use of ICMA in the field of hadith studies. While case studies involving the application of the method to specific hadith clusters is likely to feature in many of the papers, the intended focus is the broader question of method. The ability to advance questions of hadith methodology through the analysis of specific traditions is modelled by Motzki’s pioneering contributions to the field.
Papers are requested on topics addressing questions such as:
These topics are intended to be taken broadly and papers on ICMA from different theoretical, methodological and empirical perspectives are also welcome.
Send proposals of up to 300 words to firstname.lastname@example.org by 31 August 2023, which will be reviewed by members of the organizing committee. Please include relevant affiliation, a 200 word biography and contact information in a single Word document along with the abstract.
Conference presentations should be no longer than 20 minutes. Selected conference papers will be published as a Special Issue of the journal Comparative Islamic Studies.
The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
Editor of Comparative Islamic Studies (CIS) (Equinox)
Cambridge Muslim College
Editor of Edinburgh Studies in Islamic Scripture and Theology
Alwaleed bin Talal Chair of Islamic Civilization in the School of Foreign Service
Centre for Islamic Studies and Civilisation
Charles Sturt University
Assistant Professor Islamic Studies
Respect Graduate School
Welcome and Introduction
Welcome and Acknowledgements
Welcome and Opening Remarks on Hadith Studies
Introduction to the Conference Theme
Was ICMA how Early Hadith Critics Worked?
Using Isnād-cum-Matn Analysis to Verify the Authenticity of the Transmission Process of Single Strands: A Case Study of G. H. A. Juynboll
The Potential for an isnād-cum-matn Analysis Accepted by Muslim and Western Scholars: A Comparative Perspective
Home-Grown Organic ICMA? Case Study of an ICMA-Like Approach in Contemporary Muslim Scholarship
|12.00pm - 12.15pm||BREAK|
|12.15pm - 13.45pm|
Intertextuality during the Process of Transmission or How Isnād-cum-Matn Analysis Misunderstands Textual Criticism
The Limits of ICMA: al-ḥadīth al-gharīb
Reappraisal of Methodological Diversity in Isnād-cum-Matn Analysis (ICMA): A Scrutiny of Sunni and Shia Hadiths on the usage of ḍarb in Quran 4:34 (iḍribūhunna)
|13.45pm - 14.30pm||LUNCH BREAK|
|14.30pm - 16.30pm|
ICMA and Beyond: Ibn Sīrīn and the Rise of Source Verification as a Means of Hadith Criticism. A Critical Analysis of the Provenance of a Famous Report
Beyond the Common Link: The Utility and Necessity of Form Criticism and Literary Analysis
Text-hadith Review Procedures such as ICMA as a Tool for a Contemporary Islamic Theology? A Critical Review of Some Apostasy Hadiths and the Significance of Isnād-cum-matn Analysis
Bio-Bibliographical Cross-Reference Analysis: A tailoring approach to applying ICMA to Imāmī ḥadīth
|9.30am - 11.00am|
The Narrator’s Fingerprint: Transmitter-based Stylometry as a Supplement to ICMA Hadith Studies
A New Counter-Taṣḥīf Method for Determining the Textual Similarity in ICMA
|11.00am - 11.15am||BREAK|
|11.15am - 13.15pm|
Comparative Analysis of the ICMA Method and Classical Islamic Hadith Science: A Focus on Motzki's Works and the Murder of Ibn Abi al-Huqayq
The Reception of Harald Motzki’s Isnad cum Matn Theory in The Muslim World: With Special Reference to Indonesian Hadith Scholarship
Islamic and Modern Western Ḥadīth Criticism Inter-Receptions: A Qualitative Analysis of ICMA
|13.15pm - 14.00pm||LUNCH BREAK|
|14.00pm - 16.00pm|
Debating the Sanctity of Medina: A Reevaluation of Hadith Narratives
Isnād-cum-matn and the Islamic Historical Tradition: The ‘Narrativisation’ Process in the Accounts of Ibn al-Zubayr’s Early Career
Mapping Isnāds and Mining Biographical Dictionaries: Recovering the Social Legitimation of the Caliph’s Court
|16.00pm - 16.30pm||Concluding Session/Publication Discussion|
Ramon Harvey, Cambridge Muslim College
Sadeq Ansari, Respect Graduate School
Ulrika Mårtensson, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
If you have further questions please contact email@example.com